Ann Coulter NBC Today Show w/Kathie Lee Gifford - Avoiding the Issues
Ann Coulter NBC Today Show w/Kathie Lee Gifford - Avoiding the Issues
- Add To Favorites
- Favorited Successfully!
- Favorite Failed!
- Already Added!
- Login To Add!
- Cannot favorite your own video!
- Write Comments
- Innappropiate
- Feature This!
- Please Login to flag this video!
- Your inappropriate request is sent successfully!
- Failed to send your inappropiate request!
- Please login to send a feature request!
- Your feature quest has been sent successfuly!
- Error while send your feature request!
-
Copyright © 2008-2010 PopModal The Conservative Alternative to YouTube. All rights reserved. Designed by
SmashPen, Powered By
PopModal
As Ann cites in her book, there is no question that Obama was referring to Palin with his "lipstick on a pig" remark. It was clearly a reference to the fact that Palin had compared herself to a pitbull, except that she wears lipstick. What Coulter does in her book is she goes through all the headlines the next day after Palin's speech that had the same joke that Obama used. The crowd knew he was referring to Palin, everyone else did, but liberals want to deny it. Had McCain used the "lipstick on a pig" line about Hillary, two days after she had said she was a pitbull in lipstick, I'm sure Democrats would have been all over him for it, but because it is archangel Obama who is incapable of doing wrong, everyone denies it. Why am I not surprised...
Obama was discussing the McCain/Palin ticket and policies at the time he said the "lipstick on a pig" line, so for one to say the context had nothing to do with Palin, like so many liberal liars, oops...I mean "commentators" have said, is absolutely preposterous.
Conservatives didn't get the substance wrong, liberals are trying to deny a clearly mean spirited and quite frankly repulsively sexist comment made by "Archangel" Hussein.
Perfect example of conservatives doing this, which Ann takes part in as well: the very common "lipstick on a pig" expression said by Obama, which McCain even used in the past to describe Hillary's healthcare plan. At that time, no one was asinine enough to say that McCain was referring to Hillary Clinton personally.
Using the entire quote, Obama was very clearly referring to McCain now parading himself as an agent of change when he has voted with George W. Bush more than 90% of the time (something he was proud of back in 2003 when Bush was still popular), to which Obama said "You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It's still gonna stink."
Republicans and Ann said the lipstick comment was a slam on Sarah Palin. I'm actually surprised Ann didn't surmise that Obama's old fish comment was referring to Sarah Palin's genitalia.
All that "obfuscation", but not one conservative counterargued the actual true substance of Obama's argument. Ann, not only did you get the tone and language wrong, you got the substance wrong too. It was much easier for conservatives to divert and argue that it was attacking Palin personally, knowing full well what the substance of Obama's argument really was. Oh well, conservatives have never been adept at arguing facts. Everyone knows reality always has a liberal bias.
Of course liberals attack "tone" over "substance!" Their "substance" doesn't exist!
ConservativeC,
You expect in-depth discussion from that bubble-headed Kathie Lee Gifford?? Next to Katie Couric, she is the MOST bubble-headed female "journalist" ever!
www.thelaloser.com
Why is there more discussion about "tone and language" than there is about the valid points Coulter makes THROUGHOUT her new book?
What happened to intellectual debate in America? What happened to people reading a book, finding accurate quotes and launching a counterargument based on other evidence? No, all we see is Liberals ranting about language and tone to obfuscate their inability to launch an academic counterargument.
Login to comment this video